Evidence, Economics, And Emphysema: Medicare’s Long Journey With Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 24 (1) , 55-66
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.55
Abstract
Use of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) increased in the mid-1990s as a palliative therapy for severe emphysema. Rapid growth in procedure volume despite little evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness prompted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to suspend payments and cosponsor a nationwide randomized controlled trial to evaluate the procedure. In this paper we describe the trial and its influence on the CMS's recent coverage decision for LVRS. We describe the implications of this study for evidence-based evaluation of surgical procedures and Medicare's potential role in evaluating experimental treatments that affect its beneficiaries.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicare Coverage for Technological Innovations — Time for New Criteria?New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Why Medicare Has Not Established Criteria for Coverage DecisionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Results of lung volume reduction surgery in patients meeting a national emphysema treatment trial high-risk criterionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Clinical Use Of Medical Devices In The ‘Bermuda Triangle’Health Affairs, 2004
- The National Emphysema Treatment Trial — How Strong Is the Evidence?New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Lung-Volume–Reduction Surgery with Medical Therapy for Severe EmphysemaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Patients at High Risk of Death after Lung-Volume–Reduction SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Economic analysis of lung volume reduction surgery as part of the national emphysema treatment trialThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Quality of life assessment for cost/utility studies in cancerCancer Treatment Reviews, 1993
- Comparison of internal mammary artery ligation and sham operation for angina pectoris∗The American Journal of Cardiology, 1960