Forward and Backward Intergenerational Goods: Why Is Social Security Good for the Environment?
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 93 (3) , 813-834
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157106
Abstract
This paper studies the ability of nonmarket institutions to invest optimally in forward intergenerational goods (FIGs), such as education and the environment, when agents are selfish or exhibit paternalistic altruism. We show that backward intergenerational goods (BIGs), such as social security, play a crucial role in sustaining investment in FIGs: without them investment is inefficiently low, but with them optimal investment is possible. We also show that making the provision of BIGs mandatory crowds out the voluntary provision of FIGs, and that population aging can increase investment in FIGs.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Positive Theory of Social Security Based on ReputationJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Money Is MemoryJournal of Economic Theory, 1998
- The Intergenerational Case of Missing Markets and Missing VotersLand Economics, 1998
- Informational Constraints and the Overlapping Generations Model: Folk and Anti-Folk TheoremsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1998
- SOME INEFFICIENCY IMPLICATIONS OF GENERATIONAL POLITICS AND EXCHANGE*Economics & Politics, 1993
- Repeated Games Played by Overlapping Generations of PlayersThe Review of Economic Studies, 1992
- Multimarket Contact and Collusive BehaviorThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1990
- The Family and the StateThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1988
- Cooperation in Ongoing OrganizationsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986
- Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?Journal of Political Economy, 1974