Promoting Equity in Health Through Research and Understanding
- 8 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Developing World Bioethics
- Vol. 4 (1) , 76-95
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8731.2004.00068.x
Abstract
Developing strategies to reduce inequities in health requires an understanding of how inequities occur, determining the salient factors in their production, and deciding which ones are most amenable to change. The recognition of several principles regarding the manifestations and genesis of inequities can help to decide on strategies. In making decisions, it is important to consider whether the aim is to reduce disparities in the occurrence of ill health or to reduce disparities in the severity (including co-morbidity, disability, dysfunction and fatality) of ill health. Evidence shows that the major impact on equity of health services, particularly regarding their potential to reduce severity, is attributable to the strength of primary care resources and services in communities and countries. Virtually every influence on the genesis of inequities is determined by the political context in which policy is made. The issue of health services is not different in this regard from other types of strategies. There is no longer any doubt about the pervasive influence of social factors on health. Almost two centuries of descriptive research provides convincing evidence of associations between social structures and relationships and health status in all countries and in all societies; if there is anything new from more recent research, it is that the association is not limited to differences between the lowest social strata and other social strata. Rather, the association is noted throughout the social spectrum. That is, there is a social gradient in health such that, for many if not most manifestations of ill health, the lower the social stratum, the worse the health. The challenge for the future is to understand why this is the case, to create a consensus that these inequalities are unnecessary and unacceptable, and to devise strategies that are both effective and possible. This paper will focus on the first of these aims, in a context that facilitates attention to the second and third aims.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Care, Income Inequality, and Stroke Mortality in the United StatesStroke, 2003
- Primary Care Quality: Community Health Center and Health Maintenance OrganizationSouthern Medical Journal, 2003
- Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: Does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003
- Addressing health inequalitiesThe Lancet, 2002
- Equity in prevention and health careJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- The inverse care law todayThe Lancet, 2002
- Producing health, consuming health carePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Basic concepts in population health and health careJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Socio-economic differences in general practitioner and outpatient specialist care in the Netherlands: A matter of health insurance?Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Equity and the distribution of UK National Health Service resourcesJournal of Health Economics, 1991