Planning speech one syllable at a time: the reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Aphasiology
- Vol. 13 (9-11) , 793-805
- https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885
Abstract
This investigation examined the phonologic similarity effect among individuals with aphasia (APH), with aphasia and apraxia of speech (APH/AOS) and normal controls (NC). Participants repeatedly produced pairs of rhyming words that contrasted with respect to the featural similarity of their onsets (i.e. shared voicing and manner, shared place and manner, no shared features). Rogers and Storkel (1998) used similar word pairs, but presented them one at a time, ostensibly requiring reprogramming of pre-motor processing buffers whenever a novel word was presented. They found that phonologic similarity delayed naming. In the present investigation, a parameter remapping task was used in which both words in the pair were presented before speakers began the rapid serial productions, thus alleviating the need to reprogram the processing buffer between the first and second word. Two measures of inter-word interval duration were obtained. The APH and NC groups showed no differences in inter-word interval length between the 'shared features' and 'no shared features' conditions but the APH/AOS group did. Since neither the APH nor the NC group exhibited the phonologic similarity effect in the context of a task that permitted two words to be programmed in advance, the susceptibility of the APH/AOS group to the featural similarity manipulation suggests that the capacity of their processing buffers may have been sufficiently reduced to have precluded programming of both words simultaneously. These findings support the hypothesis that one factor contributing to the disruption of normal speech production in AOS is a reduction in the capacity to program multiple syllables at a time.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The vowel lengthening exaggeration effect in speakers with apraxia of speech: Compensation, artifact, or primary deficit?Aphasiology, 1997
- Effects of Irrelevant Sounds on Phonological Coding in Reading Comprehension and Short term MemoryThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1996
- The sequential cuing effect in speech productionCognition, 1994
- Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speechJournal of Memory and Language, 1990
- Disturbed coarticulation in apraxia of speech: Acoustic evidenceBrain and Language, 1986
- The division between onsets and rimes in English syllablesJournal of Memory and Language, 1986
- The representation of phonological information during speech production planning:evidence from vowel errors in spontaneous speechPhonology Yearbook, 1986
- Anticipatory coarticulation in a patient with apraxia of speechBrain and Language, 1985
- Acoustical Analysis of Vowel Duration in Apraxia of Speech: A Case StudyFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 1983
- Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token TestCortex, 1978