Long-Term Morbidity and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Anterior Resection for Upper Rectal Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 52 (4) , 558-566
- https://doi.org/10.1007/dcr.0b013e31819ec20c
Abstract
We have previously reported the five-year results of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for cancer of the upper rectum and rectosigmoid junction. The aim of this follow-up study is to report on the long-term morbidity and ten-year oncologic outcomes among the subgroup of patients with upper rectal cancer. From September 1993 to October 2002, 153 patients with upper rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either laparoscopic-assisted (n = 76) or open (n = 77) anterior resection. Patients were last followed up in December 2007. Long-term morbidity, survival, and disease-free interval were prospectively recorded. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat principle. The demographic data of the two groups were comparable. More patients in the open group developed adhesion-related bowel obstruction requiring hospitalization (P = 0.001) and intervention. The overall long-term morbidity rate was also significantly higher in the open group (P = 0.012). After curative resection, the probabilities of cancer-specific survival at ten years of the laparoscopic-assisted and open groups were 83.5 percent and 78.0 percent, respectively (P = 0.595), and their probabilities of being disease-free at ten years were 82.9 percent and 80.4 percent, respectively (P = 0.698). Laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer is associated with fewer long-term complications and similar ten-year oncologic outcomes when compared with open surgery.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data From the COST Study Group TrialAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Rectosigmoid tumours: should we continue sitting on the fence?Colorectal Disease, 2007
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Defining the rectum: surgically, radiologically and anatomicallyColorectal Disease, 2006
- MRC CLASICC trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002