Case Processing: Consumer Protection in an Attorney General's Office
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law & Society Review
- Vol. 15 (3-4) , 849-910
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3053514
Abstract
This paper examines complaint processing in an attorney general's office of consumer protection. It describes how, in the implementation and routinization of a new statute, considerations external to the law or the individual case arise, transform, and begin to characterize law enforcement. The paper describes how the staff attempts to confine the office's work by creating statistical records of work done. These records are creations because the activities of the agency—investigation and resolution of consumer complaints—do not generate unambiguous criteria of completion. The office operates within practical criteria for determining when a case is finished. As the statistical records help to routinize the task of consumer protection, they become a source of bias, direction, and legitimation for law enforcement.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Good Cases—Bad Cases: Client Selection and Professional Prerogative in a Community Mental Health CenterUrban Life, 1981
- Studying Disputes by SurveyAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1981
- Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Regulating BusinessPublished by Springer Nature ,1979
- Positive Social Behavior, Morality, and DevelopmentPublished by Elsevier ,1979
- Dispute and Settlement in Rural TurkeyPublished by Brill ,1978
- Attribution and the psychology of prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- The Economics of Health and Medical CarePublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- TIME FOR DYINGThe American Journal of Nursing, 1968
- The psychology of interpersonal relations.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958