Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlation and partial mantel tests
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
- Vol. 67 (1) , 37-73
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650008812035
Abstract
This study compares empirical type I error and power of different permutation techniques that can be used for partial correlation analysis involving three data vectors and for partial Mantel tests. The partial Mantel test is a form of first-order partial correlation analysis involving three distance matrices which is widely used in such fields as population genetics, ecology, anthropology, psychometry and sociology. The methods compared are the following: (1) permute the objects in one of the vectors (or matrices); (2) permute the residuals of a null model; (3) correlate residualized vector 1 (or matrix A) to residualized vector 2 (or matrix B); permute one of the residualized vectors (or matrices); (4) permute the residuals of a full model. In the partial correlation study, the results were compared to those of the parametric t-test which provides a reference under normality. Simulations were carried out to measure the type I error and power of these permutatio methods, using normal and non-normal data, without and with an outlier. There were 10 000 simulations for each situation (100 000 when n = 5); 999 permutations were produced per test where permutations were used. The recommended testing procedures are the following:(a) In partial correlation analysis, most methods can be used most of the time. The parametric t-test should not be used with highly skewed data. Permutation of the raw data should be avoided only when highly skewed data are combined with outliers in the covariable. Methods implying permutation of residuals, which are known to only have asymptotically exact significance levels, should not be used when highly skewed data are combined with small sample size. (b) In partial Mantel tests, method 2 can always be used, except when highly skewed data are combined with small sample size. (c) With small sample sizes, one should carefully examine the data before partial correlation or partial Mantel analysis. For highly skewed data, permutation of the raw data has correct type I error in the absence of outliers. When highly skewed data are combined with outliers in the covariable vector or matrix, it is still recommended to use the permutation of raw data. (d) Method 3 should never be used.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Mantel Test versus Pearson's Correlation Analysis: Assessment of the Differences for Biological and Environmental StudiesJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2000
- An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear modelJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1999
- Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISAGeographical Analysis, 1995
- Randomization Tests in EconometricsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1995
- Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficientsJournal of Classification, 1986
- The generation of random, binary unordered treesJournal of Classification, 1984
- A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance LevelsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1983
- Permutation Tests for Association between Two Distance MatricesSystematic Zoology, 1983
- A heuristic method for the comparison of related structuresJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1981
- Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysisBiometrika, 1966