Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post‐normal medicine
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 8 (2) , 131-138
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00312.x
Abstract
The current paradigm in medicine is served by an explanatory model based on scientific positivism. We argue that there are inherent weaknesses in this model: its basis on reductionism, its reliance on linear thinking and its failure to incorporate human values invite a revision of our thinking about knowledge in medicine. We propose that a fresh explanatory model should be based on complexity theory, and argue that this better suits the new era of post-normal medicine, where analytical and predictive power are obtained by stepping back and looking at the relationships and overall context of a system rather than forcing reality into a preferred disciplinary framework. Better at times to be vaguely right, we argue, rather than precisely wrong.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Post-normal medicineFamily Practice, 2001
- Recent developments in the evidence‐based healthcare debateJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2001
- Why not zanamivir?Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, 2001
- MMR vaccine: the continuing sagaBMJ, 2001
- UK and US health-care systems: divided by more than a common languageThe Lancet, 2000
- Postmodern medicineThe Lancet, 1999
- RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in childrenThe Lancet, 1998
- washington NIH resists research funding linked to patient loadThe Lancet, 1997
- Pharmaceutical prescriptions in four European countriesThe Lancet, 1993
- Evidence-Based MedicineJAMA, 1992