Feminist and Medical Ethics: Two Different Approaches to Contextual Ethics
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Hypatia
- Vol. 4 (2) , 57-72
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00573.x
Abstract
Feminist ethics and medical ethics are critical of contemporary moral theory in several similar respects. There is a shared sense of frustration with, the level of abstraction and generality that characterizes traditional philosophic work in ethics and a common commitment to including contextual details and allowing room for the personal aspects of relationships in ethical analysis. This paper explores the ways in which context is appealed to in feminist and medical ethics, the sort of details that should be included in the recommended narrative approaches to ethical problems, and the difference it makes to our ethical deliberations if we add an explicitly feminist political analysis to our discussion of context. It is claimed that an analysis of gender is needed for feminist medical ethics and that this requires a certain degree of generality, i. e. a political understanding of context.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Need for More than JusticeCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 1987
- Trust and AntitrustEthics, 1986
- Ethical Engineers Need Not Apply: The State of Applied Ethics TodayScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1980
- Maternal ThinkingFeminist Studies, 1980
- FOR HER OWN GOODMCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 1979
- Models for Ethical Medicine in a Revolutionary AgePublished by JSTOR ,1972