Some responses of hill ewes and lambs to artificial shelter
- 1 February 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Animal Production
- Vol. 10 (1) , 59-66
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100025940
Abstract
1. Experiments were done to assess the reaction of sheep to small artificial shelters and to study the effect of these shelters on the live-weight gain of young lambs in the springs of 1958, 1959 and 1960. 2. Lambs sought shelter particularly when it was raining. They were sensitive to high wind speed and low temperature but did not usually shelter in mild dry weather. 3. Ewes were indifferent to rain and remained in the open in wet weather while many of their lambs sheltered. They occasionally used the shelters for shade in warm sunny weather when their lambs usually went with them. 4. Because of these differences between ewes and lambs in their response to shelter, during wet weather ewes were less closely associated with their lambs where they had access to shelter than where there was no shelter. 5. In the wet spring of 1958, lambs with access to shelter gained weight more slowly than those without shelter. It is postulated that the lambs with shelter may have consumed less milk than the others due to a weaker social bond with their dams. 6. None of the experiments showed that shelter improved the live-weight performance of young lambs.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of exposure in Blackface sheep with particular reference to the role of the fleeceThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1963
- The use of natural shelter by hill sheepAnimal Science, 1962
- Temperature regulation in the new-born lamb. IV. The effect of wind and evaporation of water from the coat on metabolic rate and body temperatureAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1962
- Adjustment of Milk Lamb Weaning Weights to a Standard AgeJournal of Animal Science, 1958
- Studies on the behaviour of cattle and sheep in relation to the utilization of grassThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1951