A comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Rheumatology
- Vol. 39 (6) , 655-665
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/39.6.655
Abstract
Objective. To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. In this multicentre, double‐blind trial, 999 subjects with active RA were randomized to leflunomide (n = 501; loading dose 100 mg/day for 3 days, maintenance dose 20 mg/day) or methotrexate (n = 498; 10–15 mg/week) for 52 weeks. After 1 yr the subjects could choose to stay for a second year of double‐blind treatment. The primary end‐points were tender and swollen joint counts and overall physician and patient assessments. Analyses were of the intent‐to‐treat group. Results. After 1 yr, the mean changes in the leflunomide and methotrexate groups, respectively, were −8.3 and −9.7 for tender joint count; −6.8 and −9.0 for swollen joint count; −0.9 and −1.2 for physician global assessment; −0.9 and −1.2 for patient global assessment; −14.4 and −28.2 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Improvements seen with methotrexate were significantly greater than those with leflunomide. No further improvement occurred after the second year of treatment and the distinction between the two treatments in terms of tender joint count and patient global assessment was lost. During the first year of treatment, a small and equivalent degree of radiographically assessed disease progression was seen with both drugs. After 2 yr, disease progression was significantly less with methotrexate. The most common treatment‐related adverse events in both groups were diarrhoea, nausea, alopecia, rash, headache, and elevated plasma liver enzyme levels. Over 2 yr, 21 subjects receiving methotrexate were withdrawn due to elevated plasma liver enzymes vs eight subjects taking leflunomide. Two drug‐related deaths from pulmonary causes were recorded with methotrexate vs no drug‐related deaths among the subjects receiving leflunomide. Conclusions. Both leflunomide and methotrexate are efficacious for prolonged treatment of RA. At the doses used, some clinical benefit of methotrexate over leflunomide was observed in the first year of treatment. This benefit must be weighed against the potential toxicity of this drug when used without folate supplementation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Leflunomide Compared With Placebo and MethotrexateArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1999
- Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Leflunomide Inhibits Pyrimidine de Novo Synthesis in Mitogen-stimulated T-lymphocytes from Healthy HumansJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1998
- Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1996
- The Immunosuppressive Metabolite of Leflunomide Is a Potent Inhibitor of Human Dihydroorotate DehydrogenaseBiochemistry, 1996
- Importance of Ribonucleotide Availability to Proliferating T-lymphocytes from Healthy HumansJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1995
- American college of rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activityArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- Use of short‐term efficacy/toxicity tradeoffs to select second‐line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. A metaanalysis of published clinical trialsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988