Comparison of Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressures

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective To study the differences in blood pressure readings between the auscultatory and oscillometric (Dinamap model 8100; Critikon, Tampa, Fla) methods. Design Survey of 2 blood pressure instruments. Setting Public schools. Participants Seven thousand two hundred eight schoolchildren aged 5 through 17 years. Main Outcome Measure Blood pressure levels. Results Forall children combined, Dinamap systolic pressure readings were 10 mm Hg higher (95% confidence interval, −4 to 24 mm Hg) than the auscultatory systolic pressure readings. Dinamap diastolic pressure readings were 5 mm Hg higher (95% confidence interval, −14 to 23 mm Hg) than the auscultatory Korotkoff phase V diastolic pressure readings. Conclusion These findings preclude the interchange of readings by the 2 methods. Caution must be exercised in the diagnosis of hypertension when an automated device is used.