Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
- Vol. 23 (6) , 1094-1099
- https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4660
Abstract
Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelastic control simulation codes. An overview will be presented of the two Navier-stokes aeroelastic codes currently being used In an analysis of that data. A collection or results obtained by the two methods will be compared with the BACT experimental data for a wing with a statically deflected spoiler and statically and dynamically deflected aileron. Both methods employ structured computational fluid dynamics flow solvers and continuous surface modeling for the computation of complex moving control surface geometry. Motivation for this work is the development of an integrated computational aeroelasticity and active! control simulation capability for the transonic flight regime and validation of that capability using the BACT wing data.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- An elasticity-based mesh scheme applied to the computation of unsteady three-dimensional spoiler and aeroelastic problemsPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,1999
- A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flowsPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,1992
- Modern wing flutter analysis by computational fluid dynamics methodsJournal of Aircraft, 1988
- Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving GridsAIAA Journal, 1979