The memory drum theory after twenty years
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 12 (2) , 169-171
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1980.10735217
Abstract
The difference between the Henry “memory-drum” theory and our version is that ours includes an additional assumption that, after programming has occurred, the resultant representation can be stored in short-term memory. Otherwise, the essential ideas are the same in the two theories. Implications of the presently available data for the distinction between the theories are discussed. Regardless of how one evaluates our added assumption, it is clear that the essential insight of the Henry theory has fared very well in the 20 yr since the theory first appeared in print.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Simple Reaction Time in Motor Programming StudiesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1980
- Simple and Choice Reaction Time Methods in the Study of Motor ProgrammingJournal of Motor Behavior, 1979
- Response Programming, as Assessed by Reaction Time, Does Not Establish Commands for Particular MusclesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1977
- Short-term memory as a response preparation stateMemory & Cognition, 1976
- Syllable-dependent pronunciation latencies in number naming: A replication.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970