Should Poor Risk Patients with Hodgkin's Disease be Sorted out for Intensive Treatments?
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 15 (sup1) , 31-40
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10428199509052703
Abstract
Death remains a common event in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) and also occurs in early stages. Identification of the population of HD patients who would best benefit from an intensification of the treatment is therefore necessary in both cases. A comparative review of prognostic criteria must be attempted through recent randomized trials using conventional treatment, independently of criteria used by the autologous bone-marrow transplant (ABMT) teams which rather aim to select relapsing patients. When freedom from progression (FFP) is considered in recent large series, the factors which most often predict for a high risk of failure are bulky mediastinum, B symptoms, stage in advanced HD and the number of nodal areas in early HD. However, prognostic data available to date cannot sort out any group of patients that would clearly require a high dose/potentially risky therapy. Because of the failure to identify consensual prognostic factors, the population considered till now for upfront intensification is restricted to a very small subgroup of patients with advanced disease (< to 5% of them), which makes the conduct of randomized trials very difficult within reasonable delays. The potential to identify and to clear part of the difficulties encountered with the prognostic analysis depends on the population studied: size of the data base, follow-up, disease stages, treatments given, outcome criteria selected. Finally, “sorted out” new patients with advanced and perhaps early stage HD may benefit from treatment intensification. As the initial selection characteristics are still poorly defined, a proposition is made to collect, eventually through the International Data Base for Hodgkin's Disease (IDHD) pertinent recent trials and to launch a survey. The results of the survey will be discussed at the Third International Symposium on Hodgkin's lymphoma in Köln (21–23 September 1995). Hazards of intensified regimens may be better quantified by then, so that newer more efficient strategies may be designed.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized study in stage IIIB and IV Hodgkin's disease comparing eight courses of MOPP versus an alteration of MOPP with ABVD: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Group and Groupe Pierre-et-Marie-Curie controlled clinical trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- One hundred autotransplants for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma: value of pretransplant disease status for predicting outcome.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy in advanced Hodgkin's disease: Results of a prospective clinical trial with 70 stage IIIB-IV patientsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- Chemotherapy of Advanced Hodgkin's Disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP Alternating with ABVDNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Treatment of advanced-stage massive mediastinal Hodgkin's disease: the case for combined modality treatment.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Clinical stages I and II Hodgkin's disease: a specifically tailored therapy according to prognostic factors.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Long-term results of combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy approach in Hodgkin's disease: superiority of ABVD plus radiotherapy versus MOPP plus radiotherapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Twenty years of MOPP therapy for Hodgkin's disease.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986
- The evolution and summary results of the Stanford randomized clinical trials of the management of Hodgkin's disease: 1962–1984International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1985
- A dose and time response analysis of the treatment of Hodgkin's disease with MOPP chemotherapy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1983