The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions about the Challenger
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Business and Technical Communication
- Vol. 4 (2) , 7-20
- https://doi.org/10.1177/105065199000400201
Abstract
Previous research on the communication failures contributing to the Challenger's explosion tends to ask why it happened that various people in the organizations involved knew about the faulty O-rings but failed to pass on the information to decision makers. This is a faulty question, revealing assump tions many of us unconsciously share even when we consciously reject these as sumptions. This question implies a simplistic notion of knowledge and a conduit model of communication. Insights from the sociology of technology and the new rhetoricians can help us to form better questions about rhetoric in organizations.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication: the Missing Link in the Challenger DisasterThe Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1988
- Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: an example for technical communicatorsIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 1988
- Explaining it to ourselves: The phases of national mourning in space tragedyCentral States Speech Journal, 1986
- The challenger tragedy and search for legitimacyCentral States Speech Journal, 1986
- The relationship between the public and the technical spheres of argument: A case study of the challenger seven disasterCentral States Speech Journal, 1986
- Rhetoric and Rational EnterprisesWritten Communication, 1985
- How to unmuzzle employeesEmployment Relations Today, 1984
- A Humanistic Rationale for Technical WritingCollege English, 1979
- The Structure of Scientific InferencePublished by University of California Press ,1974
- The New RhetoricPublished by Springer Nature ,1971