Identification of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells: strength and drawbacks of functional assays

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A major challenge in hematopoiesis is to conceive assays that could bring useful insights into experimental and clinical hematology. This means identifying separately the various classes of hematopoietic progenitors that are produced sequentially during the progression from stem cells to differentiated functional cells. Standardized short-term colony assays easily quantify lineage-committed myeloid precursors, but identification of primitive cells, which have both the ability to repopulate durably myeloid and lymphoid lineages and perhaps to self-renew, still depends on in vivo assays. Whatever the assay, two important requisites have to be solved: one is the definition of appropriate read-outs that will depend solely on the function of these cells, and the second is to evaluate precisely their numbers and proliferative potential in quantitative assays. When evaluating hematopoiesis, three parameters have to be taken into account: (1) the lack of reliable correlation between the phenotype of a given cell and its function. This is especially problematic in post-transplantation situations where cells from transplanted animals are analysed; (2) functionally heterogeneous cells are identified in a single assay; and (3) ontogeny-related changes in hematopoietic cell proliferation and self-renewal that, in human beings, hampers the exploration of adult stem cells. Nevertheless, years of progress in the manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells have recently resulted in the purification of a cell subset that repopulates irradiated recipients with absolute efficiency.