Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 344 (8936) , 1523-1528
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90347-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: The hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Survey of cardiac pacing in the United States in 1989The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Prevalence, circumstances, mechanisms, and risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in unipolar single-chamber ventricular pacing.Circulation, 1992
- Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Sinus Node Disease: Comparative Effects of Atrial and Ventricular PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Survival Rates after Pacemaker Implantation: A Study of Patients Paced for Sick Sinus Syndrome and Atrioventricuiar BlockPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome: A Comparison of Clinical Aspects Among Unpaced, Ventricular Inhibited Paced, and Physiologically Paced GroupsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortalityAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Dual chamber sequential pacing management of sinus node dysfunction: Advantages over single-chamber pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Symptomatic Sinus Node Disease: Natural History After Permanent Ventricular Pacing*Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1979
- Sick Sinus Syndrome Treated with Permanent Pacemaker in 109 PatientsActa Medica Scandinavica, 1979