Regulatory Pressure and Fire Sales in the Corporate Bond Market
Preprint
- 4 October 2010
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper investigates fire sales of downgraded corporate bonds induced by regulatory constraints imposed on insurance companies. Regulations either prohibit or impose large capital requirements on the holdings of speculative-grade bonds. As insurance companies hold over one third of all outstanding investment-grade corporate bonds, the collective need to divest downgraded issues may be limited by a scarcity of counterparties and associated bargaining power. Using insurance company transaction data from 2001-2005, we find that insurance companies that are relatively more constrained by regulation are, on average, more likely to sell downgraded bonds. While many bonds do not exhibit a strong price response to the downgrade, those bonds subject to a high probability of regulatory-induced selling exhibit significant price declines and subsequent reversals. These price effects appear larger during periods in which insurance companies as a group are relatively more distressed and when other potential buyers’ capital is relatively scarce.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crises, Liquidity Shocks, and Fire Sales at Financial InstitutionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Fallen Angels and Price PressureSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Excess Volatility of Corporate BondsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Measuring Abnormal Bond PerformanceThe Review of Financial Studies, 2008
- Forced Selling of Fallen AngelsThe Journal of Fixed Income, 2008
- Underpricing in the Corporate Bond MarketThe Review of Financial Studies, 2007
- Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2006
- The relations among asset risk, product risk, and capital in the life insurance industryJournal of Banking & Finance, 2002
- Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effectsJournal of Financial Markets, 2002
- Using daily stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1985