Ergative and nominative in English
- 1 April 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Linguistics
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-32
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700001626
Abstract
Consider the following two sentences: (i) a. This man cut the bread b. This man fell In both cases, many traditional accounts (e.g. Zandvoort, 1961: 236–240; Scheurweghs, 1959: 1–19; Chomsky, 1962: 138–140, 1965: 63–64; etc.) would say that we have a single clause (or sentence) which consists of two parts, a subject and a predicate. And the two examples differ in the constitution of the predicate. This distinction between the two is usually described as having to do with transitivity. In (i.a) the verb is said to take an object, and is therefore transitive; in (i.b) this is not the case, and the verb is intransitive.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a phonological theoryLingua, 1966
- Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’Journal of Linguistics, 1966
- The concept of rank: A replyJournal of Linguistics, 1966
- The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammarJournal of Linguistics, 1966
- English imperative sentencesJournal of Linguistics, 1966
- Problems of selection in transformational grammarJournal of Linguistics, 1965
- The System of Agency of the Latin NounWORD, 1964
- "Agent" et "Objet" chez PāṇiniJournal of the American Oriental Society, 1964
- A COURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTICSLanguage Learning, 1958
- Über den aktivischen und passivischen Charakter des TransitivsIndogermanische Forschungen, 1905