“Motion-Resistant” Pulse Oximetry: A Comparison of New and Old Models
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 95 (4) , 967-972
- https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200210000-00033
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of Conventional and New Pulse Oximetry in Neonatal PatientsJournal of Perinatology, 2002
- Room 301, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 10: 30 AM (PD) Sensitivity and Specificity Performance during Motion Artifact in Three Pulse Oximeters Designed for Use in MotionAnesthesiology, 2000
- Supplemental Oxygen for the Prevention of Nausea and VomitingAnesthesiology, 2000
- Comparison of the Nellcor N‐200 and N‐3000 pulse oximeters during simulated postoperative activitiesAnaesthesia, 1997
- The Effects of Motion on the Performance of Pulse Oximeters in Volunteers (Revised publication)Anesthesiology, 1997
- Evaluation of the influence of movement on saturation readings from pulse oximetersAnaesthesia, 1995
- Crying wolfCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Randomized Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry in 20,802 Patients; IAnesthesiology, 1993
- A prospective study of intraoperative pulse oximetry failureJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1991
- EFFECT OF MOTION ARTEFACT ON PULSE OXIMETERS: EVALUATION OF FOUR INSTRUMENTS AND FINGER PROBESBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990