Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African–American and Caucasian patients
Top Cited Papers
- 9 July 2007
- Vol. 110 (4) , 876-884
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22836
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast carcinomas in African–American patients appear to be more aggressive than in Caucasian patients due to multifactorial differences.METHODS: The authors compiled pathology data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database regarding stage, histologic grade, and estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast carcinomas diagnosed in 197,274 African–American and Caucasian patients between 1990 and 2000, and the same information, along with nuclear grade, Ki‐67, c‐erb‐B2, and p53 expression, in 2230 African–American and Caucasian patients diagnosed at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between 1995 and 2002. Immunohistochemical markers were assayed in paraffin‐embedded, formalin‐fixed tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin using antibodies to these proteins, with differences in expression analyzed by the chisquare test.RESULTS: In both databases, more African–American patients presented with advanced stage tumors and higher histologic (P < .001) and nuclear grade (P < .001) than Caucasian patients. African–American patients had less ER positivity (51.9% vs 63.1%; P < .001) but significantly higher Ki‐67 (42.4% vs 28.7%; P < .001) and p53 expression (19.4% vs 13.1%; P < .05) than Caucasian patients with all stages of disease. In addition, the basal or “triple‐negative” breast cancer phenotype was more common in African–American patients than in Caucasian patients (20.8% vs 10.4%; P < .0001), and was associated with higher histologic and nuclear grade (P < .0001).CONCLUSIONS: African–American patients with breast carcinomas are more likely than Caucasian patients to present with tumors that are of a later stage and higher grade, with higher Ki‐67 expression and more ER negativity, thereby highlighting a greater need for early screening among African–American women. Molecular studies that may explain these differences, and correlations with survival, have been proposed to identify therapeutic targets. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race, Breast Cancer Subtypes, and Survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer StudyJAMA, 2006
- Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative ChemotherapyClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- African‐American/White differences in breast carcinomaCancer, 2005
- Race is a Fundamental Prognostic Indicator for 2325 Northeastern Ohio Women with Infiltrating Breast CancerThe Breast Journal, 2005
- Gene Expression Profiling of Breast Cancer in Ethnic Populations: An Aid to Gene Discovery for the Benefit of AllThe Breast Journal, 2005
- Genetic Testing for Inherited Breast Cancer Risk in African AmericansCancer Investigation, 2005
- Breast carcinoma in African‐American and White womenCancer, 2004
- Benefits and Costs of Interventions to Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes in African American WomenJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Cancer Statistics, 2004CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Treatment choices and response rates in African-American women with breast carcinomaCancer, 2002