Evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere: Seismological and geochemical constraints
- 10 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 99 (B8) , 15359-15374
- https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00138
Abstract
Several recent models of crustal evolution are based on the belief that the thickness of the continental crust is proportional to its age, with ancient crust being the thickest. A worldwide review of seismic structure contradicts this belief and falsifies these models, at least for the Archean. Proterozoic crust has a thickness of 40–55 km and a substantial high‐velocity (>7 km/s) layer at its base, while Archean crust is only 27–40 km thick (except at the site of younger rifts and collisional boundaries) and lacks the basal high‐velocity layer. Seismology also provides evidence that the lithosphere is thickest beneath Archean cratons, while diamond ages show that this lithospheric keel must have already existed in the Archean. Geochemical data also indicate significant differences between Archean and Proterozoic lithosphere. Major and trace element studies of sediments show a change in upper crustal composition between the Archean and Proterozoic. Archean rocks are depleted in Si and K and enriched in Na, Ca, and Mg. There is also a marked change in the Eu/Eu*ratio. Mantle xenoliths and continental flood basalts show that the mantle lithosphere beneath Archean crust is ultradepleted in FeO compared to that beneath post‐Archean crust. The secular change in the crust‐forming process is attributed to a decline in mantle temperature, leading to a change in the composition of the lithospheric mantle. The higher temperature of the Archean mantle led to the eruption of komatiitic lavas, producing a refractory lithospheric mantle which is ultradepleted in FeO and volatiles. The resultant lithospheric keel is intrinsically less dense than the surrounding mantle and thus not susceptible to delamination. It was sufficiently thick and cool for diamonds to form during the Archean. In contrast, Proterozoic crust developed above fertile mantle. The eruption of continental flood basalts and underplating of basaltic sills is attributed to subsequent heating and partial melting of the lithospheric mantle. Consequently, Proterozoic crust is thickened and has a high‐velocity basal layer.This publication has 96 references indexed in Scilit:
- An experimental investigation of the Gabbro-Eclogite transformation and some geophysical implicationsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Review of recent results from continental deep seismic profiling in AustraliaTectonophysics, 1994
- Evidence of crustal thinning beneath the Limpopo Belt and Lebombo monocline of southern Africa based on regional gravity studies and implications for the reconstruction of GondwanaTectonophysics, 1992
- The Nature of the Mohorovicic DiscontinuityAnnual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1989
- The Crustal Structure of Western EuropeAnnual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1989
- Shear waves in lithosphere studies on the territory of the U.S.S.R.Tectonophysics, 1988
- Petrography and geochemistry of granitoid and metamorphite pebbles from the early Archaean Moodies Group, Barberton Mountainland/South AfricaPrecambrian Research, 1985
- Upper mantle heterogeneity in the northern part of EurasiaPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1983
- Teleseismic delay times, Bouguer anomalies and inferred thickness of the African lithosphereEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1977
- New D.S.S.-data on the crustal structure of the baltic and Ukrainian ShieldsTectonophysics, 1973