Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals
- 29 May 1993
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 340 (1292) , 207-213
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0059
Abstract
Mechanisms concerned with the recognition of biological signals act as important agents of selection on the appearance or ‘form’ of signals. Recognition of a given signal form can be achieved by many equally efficient alternative mechanisms. These alternative mechanisms will be selectively neutral and subject to change by genetic drift, thus preventing the fixation of a signal form that is optimal in releasing the receiver’s behaviour. Because signal form is a multidimensional trait with an almost infinite potential to vary, it is expected that some novel forms of signals always exist that elicit responses more readily than any of those signals that the receiver has experienced during its evolutionary history. The existence of such ‘hidden preferences’ is illustrated in simple models of recognition mechanisms based on artificial neural networks. The fundamental evolutionary instability of recognition mechanisms perhaps explains why biological signals are so variable in form, and why, in experiments, animals sometimes show greater responses to novel forms of signals than they do to familiar forms.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finchesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic sensesNature, 1993
- Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating behaviour: a cladistic test using water mites (Acari: Parasitengona)Animal Behaviour, 1992
- ResponseScience, 1991
- Female Preference Predates the Evolution of the Sword in Swordtail FishScience, 1990
- Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosusNature, 1990
- Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbirdNature, 1982
- Theoretical aspects of sexual selectionTheoretical Population Biology, 1977
- A Note on the Evolutionary Significance of "Supernormal" StimuliThe American Naturalist, 1975
- IntroductionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1966