Clinical Loyalties and the Social Purposes of Medicine
- 20 January 1999
- journal article
- health law-and-ethics
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 281 (3) , 268-274
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.3.268
Abstract
Physicians increasingly face conflicts between the ethic of undivided loyalty to patients and pressure to use clinical methods and judgment for social purposes and on behalf of third parties. The principal legal and ethical paradigms by which these conflicts are managed are inadequate, because they either deny or unsuccessfully finesse the reality of contradiction between fidelity to patients and society's other expectations of medicine. This reality needs to be more squarely acknowledged. The challenge for ethics and law is not to resolve this tension—an impossible task—but to mediate it in myriad clinical circumstances in a way that preserves the primacy of keeping faith with patients while conceding the legitimacy of society's other expectations of medicine.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethics and forensic psychiatryPsychiatric Clinics of North America, 2002
- Circumcision in the United States. Prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practicePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- A National Survey of the Arrangements Managed-Care Plans Make with PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Economic Issues in Managed CareJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 1994
- Health Insurers' Assessment of Medical NecessityUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1992
- Responsibility and the Boundaries of the SelfHarvard Law Review, 1992
- The parable of the forensic psychiatrist: Ethics and the problem of doing harmInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1990
- Institutional Control of Physician Behavior: Legal Barriers to Health Care Cost ContainmentUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1988
- Criminal Responsibility of the Mentally IllStanford Law Review, 1961
- The Law of Contracts.The Yale Law Journal, 1901