The Genetics of Ovarian Cancer: An Assessment of Current Screening Protocols and Recommendations for Counseling Families at Risk
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 39 (4) , 860-872
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-199612000-00013
Abstract
Although the need for effective ovarian cancer screening is apparent, a highly sensitive and specific screening methodology has yet to be elucidated. 42-44 Given that there are more than 43 million women in the United States older than 45 years of age and that the average cost of a pelvic sonogram is $ 275 (and $ 45 for CA125 screening), the screening of this population is estimated to increase health care costs by $ 14 billion per year. 45 The additional cost of BRCA1 screening varies according to the level of diagnostic effort required to establish BRCA1 gene mutations in a particular family and ranges from $ 295 to $ 1,200 per sample. Assuming an average cost of $ 600 per sample, initial screening of these same women would likely increased costs in excess of $ 25 billion. Current knowledge and technology in ovarian cancer screening has not yet proved beneficial for the general population or for women with fewer than two affected family members. For women with two or more affected family members, there is a 3% chance of that patient being a proband in a hereditary cancer syndrome family. 11,46 In this group, who may be at increased risk for developing a malignancy, heightened surveillance is warranted, although there are still no data to confirm that screening even these high-risk women will reduce mortality. Nevertheless, annual bimanual examination, serum CA125, and transvaginal sonography are recommended among this particular subgroup of women at risk, and are likely to be recommended for young, asymptomatic, at-risk women who screen positive for the 185delAG BRCA1 deletion commonly found in persons of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. It is only through prospective, randomized trials that reliable data regarding the risk/benefit ratio of ovarian cancer screening among various populations at risk will be determined. The results of the prospective/randomized PLCO trial and the mature data from ongoing prospective, nonrandomized screening trials for women with a family history of cancer may provide this information and are eagerly awaited.
Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current Role of Ultrasound in Ovarian Cancer ScreeningClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Characteristics Relating to Ovarian Cancer Risk: Implications for Prevention and DetectionGynecologic Oncology, 1994
- Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography.BMJ, 1993
- The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literatureHuman Reproduction, 1989
- Cancer screening degrees of proof and practical applicationCancer, 1988
- MULTIMODAL APPROACH TO SCREENING FOR OVARIAN CANCERThe Lancet, 1988
- The use of CA-125 in the diagnosis and management of endometriosisFertility and Sterility, 1986
- A Radioimmunoassay Using a Monoclonal Antibody to Monitor the Course of Epithelial Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Results of an Experiment in The Control of Cancer of The Female Pelvic Organs and Report of a Fifteen-Year Research**Presented at a meeting of the Philadelphia Obstetrical Society, March 4, 1954.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1955