MUTUAL RELEVANCE OF ETHNOGRAPHY AND DISCOURSE
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
- Vol. 23 (3) , 267-279
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124194023003001
Abstract
This article argues for the mutual relevance of ethnography and discourse analysis to field-based research. Although this is not a particularly new idea, ethnographic studies and studies of face-to-face interaction are still often conducted in ways that ignore or downplay their mutual relevance. Ethnographers are reminded of the importance of treating situated language use as a topic of inquiry in the settings they study. Conversely, students of face-to-face interaction are reminded of the importance of doing ethnography as part of their research. A variety of field-based studies are drawn on to provide examples of how sensitivity to this mutual relevance can enrich both approaches to field-based research. Finally, four articles in this special issue of Journal of Contemporary Ethnography are introduced.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The UniversitiesDiscourse & Society, 1993
- Field Research on Human Service EncountersSociological Methods & Research, 1993
- The Transformation of Gender into Conversational Advantage: A Symbolic Interactionist ApproachThe Sociological Quarterly, 1989
- Language, Interaction, and Social ProblemsSocial Problems, 1988
- Self-Work in Social Interaction: Negotiating Role-IdentitiesSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1987
- Identity Work Among the Homeless: The Verbal Construction and Avowal of Personal IdentitiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1987
- Something Old and Something NewSociological Methods & Research, 1982
- Who's got the floor?Language in Society, 1981
- The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they?↓Language in Society, 1975
- Language and woman's placeLanguage in Society, 1973