Is continued anal dilatation necessary after a Lord's procedure for haemorrhoids?
- 1 September 1980
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 67 (9) , 658-659
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800670918
Abstract
Summary: Forty patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids had a Lord's procedure performed under general anaesthetic. Anal pressures were recorded before and after the dilatation. The patients were then randomly allocated to one of two regimens. Group I was given only a bulk laxative and group 2 was given a bulk laxative and a large anal dilator to use over the next few months according to Lord's regimen. When reviewed at 3 months and 12 months there was no difference in the results between the two groups. We conclude that the use of an anal dilator does not improve the results after a Lord's procedure.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective trials of minor surgical procedures and high-fibre diet for haemorrhoids.BMJ, 1979
- The effect of Lord's procedure on anal pressureDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1979
- Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissureThe American Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Measurement of anal pressure and motility.Gut, 1976
- The internal sphincter and Lord's procedure for haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- LORD TREATMENT OF HÆMORRHOIDS: Four-year Follow-up of Fifty PatientsThe Lancet, 1975
- Evaluation of a bulk-forming evacuant in the management of haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- HÆMORRHOIDECTOMY VERSUS MANUAL DILATATION OF THE ANUSThe Lancet, 1972
- RESULTS OF THE LORD NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR HÆMORRHOIDSThe Lancet, 1972
- A day-case procedure for the cure of third-degree haemorrhoidsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969