Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
Open Access
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 83 (6) , 707-714
- https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341
Abstract
Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(-2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18-34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28-40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients age 70 years or older or patients who cannot receive cisplatinCancer, 1999
- Are platinum compounds mandatory in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer?: Pro:European Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- A Randomized Trial with Mitomycin-C/Ifosfamide Versus Mitomycin-C/Vindesine Versus Cisplatin/Etoposide in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Survival determinants in extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: the Southwest Oncology Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Randomized comparison of two combination regimens versus minimal chemotherapy in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- RANDOMIZED PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS1985
- COMPARISON OF VINDESINE PLUS CISPLATIN OR VINDESINE PLUS MITOMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER1985
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981