Application of an Empiric Bayesian Data Mining Algorithm to Reports of Pancreatitis Associated with Atypical Antipsychotics
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 24 (9) , 1122-1129
- https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.24.13.1122.38098
Abstract
Study Objective. To compare the results from one frequently cited data mining algorithm with those from a study which was published in a peer-reviewed journal, that examined the association of pancreatitis with selected atypical antipsychotics observed by traditional rule-based methods of signal detection. Design. Retrospective pharmacovigilance study. Intervention. The widely studied data mining algorithm known as the Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) was applied to adverse-event reports from the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database through the first quarter of 2003 for clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone to determine if a significant signal of pancreatitis would have been generated by this method in advance of their review or the addition of these events to the respective product labels. Measurements and Main Results. Data mining was performed by using nine preferred terms relevant to drug-induced pancreatitis from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Results from a previous study on the antipsychotics were reviewed and analyzed. Physicians' Desk References (PDRs) starting from 1994 were manually reviewed to determine the first year that pancreatitis was listed as an adverse event in the product label for each antipsychotic. This information was used as a surrogate marker of the timing of initial signal detection by traditional criteria. Pancreatitis was listed as an adverse event in a PDR for all three atypical antipsychotics. Despite the presence of up to 88 reports/drug-event combination in the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database, the MGPS failed to generate a signal of disproportional reporting of pancreatitis associated with the three antipsychotics despite the signaling of these drug-event combinations by traditional rule-based methods, as reflected in product labeling and/or the literature. These discordant findings illustrate key principles in the application of data mining algorithms to drug safety surveillance. Conclusion. The optimal place of data mining algorithms in the pharmacovigilance tool kit remains to be determined, requires consideration of numerous factors that may affect their performance, and is highly situation dependent.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pancreatitis Associated with Atypical Antipsychotics: From the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch Surveillance System and Published ReportsPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2003
- A Brief Primer on Automated Signal DetectionAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2003
- Quantitative Methods in PharmacovigilanceDrug Safety, 2003
- Use of Screening Algorithms and Computer Systems to Efficiently Signal Higher-Than-Expected Combinations of Drugs and Events in the US FDA??s Spontaneous Reports DatabaseDrug Safety, 2002
- Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reportsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001
- A Retrospective Evaluation of a Data Mining Approach to Aid Finding New Adverse Drug Reaction Signals in the WHO International DatabaseDrug Safety, 2000
- Bayesian Data Mining in Large Frequency Tables, with an Application to the FDA Spontaneous Reporting SystemThe American Statistician, 1999
- False‐positives in spontaneous reporting: should we worry about them?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994