Steroids and Spinal Cord Injury
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- current opinion
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Vol. 45 (6) , 1088-1093
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199812000-00021
Abstract
The National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) 2 and 3 trials are often cited as evidence that high-dose methyl-prednisolone is an efficacious intervention in the management of acute spinal cord injury. Neither of these studies convincingly demonstrate the benefit of steroids. There are concerns about the statistical analysis, randomization, and clinical end points. Even if the putative gains are statistically valid, the clinical benefits are questionable. Furthermore, the benefits of this intervention may not warrant the possible risks. This paper comments on these two clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Administration of Methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 Hours or Tirilazad Mesylate for 48 Hours in the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord InjuryJAMA, 1997
- International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord InjurySpinal Cord, 1997
- Effects of timing of methylprednisolone or naloxone administration on recovery of segmental and long-tract neurological function in NASCIS 2Journal of Neurosurgery, 1993
- A Consumer's Guide to Subgroup AnalysesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- A model for estimating level and net severity of spinal cord injuriesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up dataJournal of Neurosurgery, 1992
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- SUBGROUP ANALYSISThe Lancet, 1988