Large Bowel Obstruction: Predictive Factors for Postoperative Mortality
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 47 (11) , 1889-1897
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0688-7
Abstract
Surgery for colonic obstruction were studied. Patients with an obstructive lesion distal to the splenic flexure were assessed as having a distal colonic obstruction. Resection and primary anastomosis was the operation of choice in selected patients. Alternative procedures were Hartmann's procedure in high-risk patients, subtotal colectomy in cases of associated proximal colonic damage, and colostomy or intestinal bypass in the presence of irresectable lesions. Obstruction was considered proximal when the tumor was situated at the splenic flexure or proximally and a right or extended right colectomy was performed. A range of factors were investigated to estimate the probability of death: gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, nature of obstruction (benignvs. malign), location of the lesion (proximalvs. distal), associated proximal colonic damage and/or peritonitis, preoperative transfusion, preoperative renal failure, and laboratory data (hematocrit ≤30 percent, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl, and leukocyte count >15,000/mm3). Univariate and multivariate forward steptwise logistic regression analysis was used to study the prognostic value of each significant variable in terms of mortality. RESULTS: One or more complications were detected in 109 patients (46.5 percent). Death occurred in 44 patients (18.8 percent). No differences were observed between proximal and distal obstruction. Age (>70 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists III-IV score, preoperative renal failure, and the presence of proximal colon damage with or without peritonitis were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in the univariate analysis. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of proximal colon damage, and preoperative renal failure were significant predictors of outcome in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Large bowel obstruction still has a high of mortality rate. An accurate preoperative evaluation of severity factors might allow stratification of patients in terms of their mortality risk and help in the decision-making process for treatment. Such an evaluation would also enable better comparison between studies performed by different authors. Principles and stratification similar to those of distal lesions should be considered in patients with proximal colonic obstruction. Reprints are not available. aColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, C/ Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907, Barcelona, Spain, e-mail: sbiondo@csub.scs.es © The ASCRS 2004...Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colo‐rectal surgeryColorectal Disease, 2003
- Emergency Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers: A Comparison Between Right-Sided and Left-Sided LesionsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- One-stage procedure in non-elective surgery for diverticular disease complicationsColorectal Disease, 2001
- Prospective study of primary anastomosis without colonic lavage for patients with an obstructed left colonBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Emergency large bowel surgery: a 15-year auditInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1997
- Malignant obstruction of the left colonBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Surgical management of the acutely obstructed colonThe American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Malignant large bowel obstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- The Morbidity and Mortality of Emergent Operations for Colorectal DiseaseAnnals of Surgery, 1984
- The treatment of colonic cancer presenting with intestinal obstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977