The Positive Surgical Margin after Radical Prostatectomy—Why do we Still not Really Know What it Means?
- 31 August 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 50 (2) , 199-201
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.016
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Actual Value of the Surgical Margin Status as a Predictor of Disease Progression in Men with Early Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2006
- Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: Multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patientsUrology, 2005
- Open Retropubic Nerve-Sparing Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2005
- DO MARGINS MATTER? THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)The Lancet, 2005
- Influence of Nerve-Sparing (NS) Procedure during Radical Prostatectomy (RP) on Margin Status and Biochemical FailureEuropean Urology, 2004
- Assessment of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics Predisposing to Disease Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Pathologically Organ-Confined Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2002
- Biological Determinants of Cancer Progression in Men With Prostate CancerJAMA, 1999
- Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.European Urology, 1999
- Prognostic Significance of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1995