Ladder proof of nonlocality without inequalities and without probabilities
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 58 (3) , 1687-1693
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.58.1687
Abstract
The ladder proof of nonlocality without inequalities for two spin- particles proposed by Hardy [in New Developments on Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics, edited by M. Ferrero and A. van der Merwe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997)] and Hardy and co-workers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2755 (1997)] works only for nonmaximally entangled states and goes through for 50% of pairs at the most. A similar ladder proof for two spin- particles in a maximally entangled state is presented. In its simplest form, the proof goes through for 17% of pairs. An extended version works for 100% of pairs. The proof can be extended to any maximally entangled state of two spin- particles (with .
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hardy's nonlocality for two spin-s particlesPhysics Letters A, 1998
- Ladder Proof of Nonlocality without Inequalities: Theoretical and Experimental ResultsPhysical Review Letters, 1997
- Experimental test of the violation of local realism in quantum mechanics without Bell inequalitiesPhysical Review A, 1997
- Test of the violation of local realism in quantum mechanics without Bell inequalitiesPhysics Letters A, 1997
- Experimental demonstration of the violation of local realism without Bell inequalitiesPhysics Letters A, 1995
- Triorthogonal uniqueness theorem and its relevance to the interpretation of quantum mechanicsPhysical Review A, 1994
- Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled statesPhysical Review Letters, 1993
- Locality, Lorentz invariance, and linear algebra: Hardy's theorem for two entangled spin-s particlesPhysics Letters A, 1992
- Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradoxFoundations of Physics, 1983
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Physical Review B, 1935