Abundance‐range size relationships of breeding and wintering birds in Britain: a comparative analysis
- 1 December 1997
- Vol. 20 (6) , 569-579
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00425.x
Abstract
Both breeding and wintering assemblages of birds in Britain exhibit positive interspecific relationships between population size and geographic range size, such that the average density of species is greater if they are more widely distributed Species in common to both assemblages, that is resident species, had greater population sizes, geographic range sizes, and densities in winter In contrast, whilst winter migrants had higher abundances than summer migrants, the range sizes of the former were disproportionately larger still, resulting in a lower density for species that only winter in Britain than for those that only breed Such differences aside, the overall form of the abundance‐range size relationship is remarkably similar between the two assemblages and their constituent subsets of speciesKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- CLIMATE CHANGE AND SIZE EVOLUTION IN AN ISLAND RODENT SPECIES: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE ISLAND RULEEvolution, 2004
- Abundance‐range size relationships in British birds: is unexplained variation a product of life history?Ecography, 1997
- Interspecific abundance‐range size relationships: range position and phylogenyEcography, 1997
- Coincidence between consumer and host occurrence: macrolepidoptera in BritainEcological Entomology, 1997
- The Multiple Forms of the Interspecific Abundance-Distribution RelationshipOikos, 1996
- Species abundance patterns of British birdsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Are Floristic Areas Hierarchically Arranged?Journal of Biogeography, 1992
- A Hierarchical Analysis of Species' Abundance Patterns in Grassland VegetationThe American Naturalist, 1990
- The Distribution and Abundance of Tallgrass Prairie Plants: A Test of the Core-Satellite HypothesisThe American Naturalist, 1987
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985