The Health Belief Model as a Conceptual Framework for Explaining Contraceptive Compliance
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Education Monographs
- Vol. 5 (3) , 231-243
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817700500304
Abstract
The problem of compliance in family planning is discussed in relation to the lack of theoretical and conceptual clarity in research, which has produced contradictory, and often inconsistent findings. Current research has contributed little to explaining the phenomenon of compliance and to directing further research. The Health Belief Model, which has been demonstrated to have application in the areas of preventive health behavior and compliance with medical regimens, is offered as a potentially useful conceptual framework for family planning research. The generalization of the Health Belief Model to family planning behavior is seen as an out-growth of the theoretical strength of the Model and the similarities between family planning and other health behavior.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some influences on public participation in a genetic screening programJournal of Community Health, 1975
- Intrauterine device retention: a study of selected social-psychological aspects.American Journal of Public Health, 1975
- A comparison of program and contraceptive use continuation rates in a family planning clinic.American Journal of Public Health, 1975
- Compliance with Contraceptive RegimensStudies in Family Planning, 1974
- Factors associated with dropping out of family planning clinics in Jamaica.American Journal of Public Health, 1973
- SINGAPORE: The Use of Oral Contraceptives in the National ProgramStudies in Family Planning, 1969
- KOREA AND TAIWAN: Review of Progress in 1968Studies in Family Planning, 1969
- Use of Oral Contraceptives: With Special Reference to Developing CountriesStudies in Family Planning, 1967
- Retention of IUDs: An International ComparisonStudies in Family Planning, 1967
- Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty.Psychological Review, 1959