The development of moral judgments concerning capital punishment.
- 1 July 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 45 (4) , 614-640
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1975.tb01191.x
Abstract
Data from a 20-year longitudinal study of the development of moral judgment in American males indicate that the most mature stages evince moral condemnation of the death penalty. The authors conclude that American moral standards are evolving towards a view of execution as unjust punishment. They contend that a theory of punishment based on the highest stage of moral reasoning is more valid than lower-stage justifications for capital punishment, and that it provides a rational basis for asserting the immorality--and unconstitutionality--of capital punishment, irrespective of uncertainties as to the deterrent efficacy of the death penalty.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Opinion and the Death PenaltyStanford Law Review, 1974
- The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral JudgmentThe Journal of Philosophy, 1973
- Toward a Theory of Limited Punishment: An Examination of the Eighth AmendmentStanford Law Review, 1972
- A Theory of JusticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1971
- The Polls: Capital PunishmentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1970
- On Deterrence and the Death PenaltyThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1969
- Capital Punishment in Texas, 1924-1968Crime & Delinquency, 1969
- Revival of the Eighth Amendment: Development of Cruel-Punishment Doctrine by the Supreme CourtStanford Law Review, 1964