Discretionary Methodological Decisions in Applied Research
- 1 February 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 5 (3) , 317-334
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417700500303
Abstract
The process of completing any piece of empirical research requires that a large number of methodological decisions be made at each step in the undertaking. Some of these decisions are very clearly prescribed by conventional practice, while others allow for wide discretion. This paper discusses various kinds of discretionary decisions in applied research where special difficulties are necessarily produced by the requirement to speak to the needs of policy makers and other research users. Emphasizing the inevitable advocacy role of applied researchers, suggestions are provided for which kinds of discretionary methodological decisions in applied research should be encouraged and which should be condemned.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Proof of Intentional DiscriminationEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- Issues of Design and Analysis in Evaluation ResearchSociological Methods & Research, 1975
- Alchemy in the Behavioral SciencesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1972
- Problems in Making Policy Inferences from the Coleman ReportAmerican Sociological Review, 1970