The significance of uncertain gestation for obstetric outcome
- 1 May 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 92 (5) , 452-460
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01348.x
Abstract
Summary. An analysis of 11454 singleton births in a ‘total obstetric population’ (Aberdeen City District) from 1976 to 1980 showed that women whose gestation was assessed as approximate or uncertain had less favourable characteristics than the certain group. Uncertainty was significantly related to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as perinatal mortality, low birthweight, and spontaneous preterm delivery, and the association with the adverse outcomes was independent of unfavourable maternal characteristics. Moreover, uncertainty ‘explained’ adverse outcomes better than the traditional sociodemographic variables used in the analysis. It is argued that research findings based only on women of certain gestation cannot be generalized to total populations including women of uncertain gestation and will be subject to bias.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Epidemiology of pregnancies with unknown last menstrual period.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1984
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- ANALYSIS OF BIRTH WEIGHT, GESTATIONAL AGE, AND FETAL VIABILITY, U. S. BIRTHS, 1968Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1974
- THE ASSESSMENT OF FETAL GROWTHBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1968