Valuing Insect Pollination Services with Cost of Replacement
Open Access
- 10 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (9) , e3128
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003128
Abstract
Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards more inclusive long-term bulk water resource managementAgrekon, 2007
- What's Killing American Honey Bees?PLoS Biology, 2007
- Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world cropsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflowerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Influence of honey bee (Apis mellifera) on kiwifruit pollination and fruit quality under Australian conditionsNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 2001
- ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator InteractionsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1998
- Some factors influencing fruit set in ‘Sundrop’ apricotNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 1996
- Bee Pollination and Productivity Growth: The Case of AlfalfaAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987
- Meade, Bees, and ExternalitiesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1973