Postlicensure Monitoring of Intussusception After RotaTeq Vaccination in the United States, February 1, 2006, to September 25, 2007
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 121 (6) , 1206-1212
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3793
Abstract
BACKGROUND. In 1999, a previous rotavirus vaccine (RotaShield; Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, PA) was withdrawn from the US market after postlicensure monitoring identified an association with intussusception. Although the new rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq; Merck, West Point, PA) introduced in 2006 was not associated with intussusception in prelicensure trials, additional monitoring is important to ensure a complete safety profile. METHODS. We assessed intussusception reports after RotaTeq vaccination by using data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a cohort of children enrolled in managed care. Observed versus expected rate ratios were determined by using vaccine dose distribution data and Vaccine Safety Datalink background intussusception rates. RESULTS. Between February 1, 2006, and September 25, 2007, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received 160 intussusception reports after RotaTeq vaccination. With the assumptions that reporting completeness was 75% and that 75% of the distributed doses of RotaTeq were administered, the observed versus expected rate ratios were 0.53 and 0.91 for the 1–21 and 1–7 day interval after vaccination, respectively. In the Vaccine Safety Datalink, 3 intussusception cases occurred within 30 days after 111521 RotaTeq vaccinations, compared with 6 cases after 186722 non–RotaTeq vaccinations during the same period. If, like RotaShield, RotaTeq had a 37-fold increased risk of intussusception within 3 to 7 days after vaccination, then 8 intussusception cases would be expected within 3 to 7 days among the ∼84000 infants vaccinated with the first dose of RotaTeq in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (N = 49902) and the prelicensure trial (N = 34035) combined, whereas no cases have been observed. CONCLUSIONS. Available data do not indicate that RotaTeq is associated with intussusception. Although an intussusception risk similar in magnitude to that of RotaShield can be excluded, continued monitoring is necessary for complete assessment of the safety profile of RotaTeq.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Will Pediatricians Adopt the New Rotavirus Vaccine?Pediatrics, 2007
- Safety and Efficacy of a Pentavalent Human–Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus VaccineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Active Surveillance of Vaccine SafetyEpidemiology, 2005
- The Role of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in Monitoring Vaccine SafetyPediatric Annals, 2004
- The First Oral Rotavirus Vaccine, 1998–1999: Estimates of Uptake from the National Immunization SurveyPublic Health Reports®, 2003
- Enhancing Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Capture-Recapture Analysis of Intussusception after Rotavirus VaccinationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Intussusception Among Recipients of Rotavirus Vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting SystemPediatrics, 2001
- Intussusception among Infants Given an Oral Rotavirus VaccineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- An overview of the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) as a surveillance systemVaccine, 1999
- The reporting sensitivities of two passive surveillance systems for vaccine adverse events.American Journal of Public Health, 1995