Predictors and Outcomes of Ad Hoc Versus Non-Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
- 30 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 2 (4) , 350-356
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes Following Immediate (Ad Hoc) Versus Staged Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (Report from the 2000 to 2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2007
- Ad Hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease—A study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC‐NCDR®)Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2006
- Impact of cardiac catheterization-percutaneous coronary intervention timing on inhospital mortalityAmerican Heart Journal, 2002
- Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization in northern New England and comparison with similar procedures performed laterThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Ad hoc coronary interventionCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2000
- One-stage coronary angiography and angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Safety and cost effectiveness of combined coronary angiography and angioplastyAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty performed at time of diagnostic catheterization compared with that performed at other timesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983