Confounds of insensitivity and blind luck: Statistical conclusion validity in stroke rehabilitation clinical trials
- 30 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 74 (6) , 559-565
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(93)90152-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute stroke patients: Long-term effects of rehabilitation and maintenance of gainsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1991
- Statistical Conclusion Validity of Rehabilitation ResearchAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1990
- Measures of Effect Size in the Reporting of Rehabilitation ResearchAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1989
- Rehabilitation for stroke: a review.Stroke, 1986
- Applied statistical power analysis and the interpretation of nonsignificant results by research consumers.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1985
- A synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1982
- Statistics in question. Assessing methods--art of significance testing.BMJ, 1981
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962