On Dimensionalizing Roll Call Votes in the U.S. Congress
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 85 (3) , 955-976
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1963858
Abstract
Two related issues have developed in the scale analysis of voting in the U. S. Congress. One is methodological; it concerns the appropriate dimensionalizing model. The other is more substantive, entailing interpretation of the extent to which voting dimensions carry an ideological component. Kenneth Koford contributed to consideration of these issues in his research note, “Dimensions in Congressional Voting,” in the September 1989 issue of this Review. In this controversy, his claims are challenged vigorously by Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. In turn, Koford defends his argument that “much roll call voting in Congress does not fit a single dimension.”Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shirking, representation, and Congressional behavior: Voting on the 1983 amendments to the Social Security ActPublic Choice, 1990
- Dimensions in Congressional VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- A test for pure or apparent ideology in congressional votingPublic Choice, 1989
- Constraint in European party activists’ sympathy scores for interest groupsEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1987
- Analysis of Congressional Coalition Patterns: A Unidimensional Spatial ModelLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1987
- CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND CONGRESSIONAL VOTING - A SIMULTANEOUS PROBIT-TOBIT MODELThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1981
- Self-Interest, Ideology, and Logrolling in Congressional VotingThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1979
- Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter result is an artifactJournal of Economic Theory, 1977
- American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political TheoryWorld Politics, 1964