Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: The Experience of Brescia Civic Hospital

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The accuracy of the sentinel node technique in the evaluation of axillary node involvement in breast cancer was evaluated in 83 consecutive patients with monofocal T1–2 carcinoma, who were clinically N0 and who underwent lymphoscintigraphy with 99mTc-colloid integrated with intraoperative sentinel node detection by a portable probe. Lymphoscintigraphy revealed at least one sentinel node in 75 patients (90.4%), always identified by the probe. In eight patients (9.6%) the sentinel node was detected neither by lymphoscintigraphy nor by the probe. All removed lymph nodes were analyzed by hematoxylin-eosin histology and the sentinel node by immunostaining. In 28/75 patients (37.3%) at least one metastatic axillary lymph node was detected; in 16 of the 28 N+ subjects (57%) only the sentinel node was positive. The false negative rate (sentinel node negative/other axillary lymph nodes positive) was 17.85% (5/28 patients). In 9/23 patients (39%) micrometastases were found in the sentinel node only. In conclusion, specific sentinel node positivity in 57% of cases supports the validity of the sentinel node concept. Moreover, nine patients would have been considered No by standard hematoxylin-eosin histology without sentinel node-aided immunostaining. A 17.8% false negative rate calls for caution in patients with negative sentinel nodes.