Comparison of the use of amniocentesis in two countries with different policies for prenatal testing: the case of France and the United States

This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:

• A population‐based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981–2000
  BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
• Womens' preference in Down syndrome screening
  Prenatal Diagnosis, 2002
• Decision Analysis of Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal Disorders: What Do the Preferences of Pregnant Women Tell Us?
  Genetic Testing, 2001
• Efficacy of screening for fetal down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
• Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most
  Prenatal Diagnosis, 1999
• Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: Preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
• Attributions for disability: The influence of genetic screening
  Social Science & Medicine, 1995
• Reasons for women's non‐uptake of amniocentesis
  Prenatal Diagnosis, 1994
• Reducing the Need for Amniocentesis in Women 35 Years of Age or Older with Serum Markers for Screening
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
• RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN
  Published by Elsevier ,1986