Proper metrics for clinical trials: transformations and other procedures to remove non‐normality effects
- 8 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (24) , 3823-3842
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1675
Abstract
A simulation study was performed to study the effects of non‐normality and to examine procedures to ameliorate possible loss of power when data are incorrectly assumed to be normally distributed. It was found that only distributions with high asymmetry or heavy tails seriously affect the t‐test. The Box–Cox likelihood ratio test appears to have some advantages over the others, but this must be offset by the greater complexity in making the results understandable to non‐statisticians. The variability in outcomes with the different procedures demonstrates the importance of specifying such procedures a priori. Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- In All LikelihoodPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Regression Modeling StrategiesPublished by Springer Nature ,2001
- Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Robust Estimation & TestingWiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 1990
- Analysis of Covariance Using the Rank TransformationPublished by JSTOR ,1982
- Rank Transformations as a Bridge Between Parametric and Nonparametric StatisticsThe American Statistician, 1981
- Student's t-Test Under Symmetry ConditionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1969