Soft tissue sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm in the pediatric age group
Open Access
- 18 March 2004
- Vol. 100 (8) , 1758-1765
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20159
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Survivors of childhood malignancies have an increased risk of developing second malignant neoplasms (SMN) due to their prior treatment and/or genetic susceptibility. A small proportion of SMNs are soft tissue sarcomas (STS), whose prognosis is generally thought to be poor, though publications on such patients' treatment and outcome is limited.METHODS: The authors analyzed 25 patients who were registered for the Italian Cooperative Group protocols for pediatric STS from 1979 to 2000. The primary tumor was STS in five patients; Hodgkin disease in five patients; leukemia in four patients; retinoblastoma, neuroblastoma, and Wilms tumor in two patients each; and other tumor types in five patients. SMNs occurred after a median of 8 years (range, 1.9–15.0 years) and included rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in 4 patients, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in 4 patients, extraosseous Ewing family tumor (EFT) in 4 patients, leiomyosarcoma in 3 patients, fibrosarcoma in 2 patients, synovial sarcoma in 2 patients, and other tumor types in 6 patients. Treatment generally was administered according to the guidelines for primary STS.RESULTS: Seven non‐RMS patients with STS underwent surgery alone, whereas 18 patients received chemotherapy and 8 patients received radiotherapy. Retreatment was feasible with acceptable toxicity. Fifteen patients were alive in complete remission of their SMN at the time of last follow‐up. Responses to chemotherapy and survival were satisfactory for patients with tumors such as RMS and EFT. Complete tumor resection was correlated with a favorable prognosis in patients with other types of STS and in patients with postirradiation sarcoma. Two patients developed a third malignancy.CONCLUSIONS: Although prior treatment may hinder the management of these patients, pediatric STS second malignancies can be cured using the same strategies used for de novo pediatric sarcomas. Long‐term follow‐up is mandatory given the risks of further malignancies and more severe, treatment‐related side effects. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Second tumoursEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Second malignancies in children: the usual suspects?European Journal of Radiology, 2001
- Second Malignant Neoplasms in Five-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Childhood Cancer Survivor StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Treatment of solid tumors following allogeneic bone marrow transplantationBone Marrow Transplantation, 2000
- Outcome of Radiation-Related Osteosarcoma After Treatment of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer: A Study of 23 CasesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Outcome of patients with a history of bilateral retinoblastoma treated for a second malignancy: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering ExperienceMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1998
- Second Malignant Neoplasms in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood RhabdomyosarcomaCancer, 1995
- Forty-year experience with second malignancies after treatment of childhood cancer: Analysis of outcome following the development of the second malignancyJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1993
- Role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the risk of second malignant neoplasms after cancer in childhoodBritish Journal of Cancer, 1989
- The intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study.A preliminary reportCancer, 1977