Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour
- 24 July 2000
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 2,p. CD000007
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000007
Abstract
Expectant management of the third stage of labour involves allowing the placenta to deliver spontaneously or aiding by gravity or nipple stimulation. Active management involves administration of a prophylactic oxytocic before delivery of the placenta, and usually early cord clamping and cutting, and controlled cord traction of the umbilical cord. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of active versus expectant management on blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other maternal and perinatal complications of the third stage of labour. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. Randomised trials comparing active and expectant management of the third stage of labour in women who were expecting a vaginal delivery. Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by the reviewers. Five studies were included. Four of the trials were of good quality. Compared to expectant management, active management (in the setting of a maternity hospital) was associated with the following reduced risks: maternal blood loss (weighted mean difference ‐79.33 millilitres, 95% confidence interval ‐94.29 to ‐64.37); post partum haemorrhage of more than 500 millilitres (relative risk 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.46); prolonged third stage of labour (weighted mean difference ‐9.77 minutes, 95% confidence interval ‐10.00 to ‐9.53). Active management was associated with an increased risk of maternal nausea (relative risk 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.23), vomiting and raised blood pressure (probably due to the use of ergometrine). No advantages or disadvantages were apparent for the baby. Routine 'active management' is superior to 'expectant management' in terms of blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other serious complications of the third stage of labour. Active management is, however, associated with an increased risk of unpleasant side effects (eg nausea and vomiting), and hypertension, where ergometrine is used. Active management should be the routine management of choice for women expecting to deliver a baby by vaginal delivery in a maternity hospital. The implications are less clear for other settings including domiciliary practice (in developing and industrialised countries).Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostaglandins for prevention of postpartum haemorrhagePublished by Wiley ,2004
- Prophylactic ergometrine-oxytocin versus oxytocin for the third stage of labourCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004
- The prevention of post partum haemorrhage: optimising routine management of the third stage of labourEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1996
- Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A SynopsisBirth, 1995
- Care in the third stage of labourPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Management of the third stage of labour in women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhageEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1993
- The effect of ergometrine on breast feedingMidwifery, 1990
- A comparison of ‘active’ and ‘physiological’ management of the third stage of labourMidwifery, 1990
- Views of Mothers and Midwives Participating in the Bristol Randomized, Controlled Trial of Active Management of the Third Stage of LaborBirth, 1989
- The Bristol third stage trial: active versus physiological management of third stage of labour.BMJ, 1988