Tests of Competition between Native and Introduced Salmonids in Streams: What Have We Learned?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Salmonids have been introduced worldwide to regions where they were not indigenous, usually without considering the effects on native species. This has led to many combinations of species in unnatural sympatry, some of which are suspected to interact strongly, but we currently have inadequate knowledge to allow us to predict the outcome of most such introductions. For example, despite current controversy about the potential effects of Pacific salmonids now stocked in Atlantic waters, we have only empirical evidence with which to judge whether they will be detrimental to Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Moreover, most experimental tests of interspecific competition between other pairs of stream salmonids have not been rigorous. A review of literature about the suspected competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in streams reveals that despite empirical evidence that water temperature and velocity play a critical interacting role in determining the outcome, most experiments have failed to elucidate the important mechanisms involved. Carefully designed experiments that compare the strength of interspecific versus intraspecific competition for different size classes will allow us to improve predictions about the effects of introduced salmonids on native species in streams.

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: